WHAT IS NCT AND
WHAT ARE
SOME OF ITS MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS?
By Gary D. Long
A.
Presuppositions.
- The Existence of God is a first truth,
“for he who comes to God must believe that He is”
(Heb. 11:6).
- The Scriptures are inspired, infallible,
relevant, authoritative revelation from the triune God; therefore, the
Bible as His written “word is truth” (John 17:17).
- The final revelation of God the Father is in
the eternal Son of God (Heb. 1:2), Jesus Christ, who is the Word of
God, full of grace and truth (John 1:1, 14, 17); therefore, no one can
“know the Father, except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son
wills to reveal Him (Matt. 11:27).
- There is no authentic leading of the Holy
Spirit that is not contextually wedded to
the words of the Bible (Acts 17:11; Rom. 8:14; I Cor. 2:10-11; I Thess.
1:5; II Tim. 2:15; see II Pet. 1:20-21).
B. The Need.
There is
a need for New Covenant Theology (NCT) in proclaiming the gospel of
Christ. Its principles of interpretation (its hermeneutic) are as old
as the New Testament (NT) itself. The way it interprets Scripture is
based upon how Christ and the writers of the NT understand and use the
Old Testament Scriptures in explaining the coming to pass of
God’s will on earth (Matthew 6:10). But as a theological
system in America it is a recent development having different
explanations. The time has come for those who hold to the need for NCT
to unify and explain what it is. It is in agreement with much that is
taught in the theological system of Reformed or Covenant Theology (CT),
especially with its teaching on the inspiration and inerrancy of the
Bible, the doctrine of God and creation, the doctrine of man, and the
doctrine of the person and work of Christ. It agrees with much that is
taught in the theological system of Dispensational Theology (DT),
especially its teaching on the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible,
the doctrine of God and creation, the person of Christ, and the
understanding of Pentecost as the formation of the Church as the body
of Christ. However, there are significant differences with the
theological systems of both CT and DT to warrant the development of NCT
as a distinct theological system. The following provides a brief
description and listing of some of the major characteristics of NCT as
understood by this writer.
C.
NCT Described.
New
Covenant Theology is a developing system of theology that provides a
more biblical way to interpret the Scriptures by questioning key
theological presuppositions which undergird the hermeneutics
(principles of interpretation) of CT and DT. NCT is based upon a
redemptive history approach to understanding the fulfillment of
God’s eternal kingdom purpose on earth. Its principles of
interpretation are based upon a biblical theology that stresses the
theology of the Bible itself, especially upon the NT understanding of
the OT. NCT challenges the basic theological presuppositions of the one
Covenant of Grace system of Covenant Theology, including its
understanding of the “moral law” of God and the
nature of the Church. NCT also challenges the two redemptive purposes
of Dispensational Theology, one for the Church and one for Israel, and
it challenges some of DT’s presuppositions and literal
hermeneutic for understanding key elements of Bible prophecy. The
driving motive of NCT is “back to the Bible.”
NCT emphasizes the inductive study of the Bible.
A major objective of NCT is that its hermeneutic will help bring
doctrinal unity in this sin-wrecked world by breaking down the middle
walls of doctrinal partition that exist
within the theological systems of Covenant Theology and Dispensational
Theology.
D.
NCT Characteristics.
The following lists some of the major NCT characteristics. NCT teaches
that:
- The discernment of the Holy Spirit is
absolutely essential for accurately handling the Word of God (I Cor.
2:13-14; II Tim. 2:15) and that the most important principle of
interpretation is “contextual exegesis.”
Contextual biblical exegesis demands grammatical/historical/theological
principles of interpretation.
- The imputation of Adam’s first sin
to
all mankind (Rom. 5:12d, 18a-19a), the elects’ sins to Christ
(II Cor. 5:21), and Christ’s righteousness to the elect (Rom.
5:18b-19b) are vital for the Christian faith. Without the doctrine of
imputation the whole doctrine of the substitutionary atonement and
justification by faith alone in Christ alone are undermined (Rom.
5:12-19).
- God’s plan of salvation is revealed
and administered through the unfolding of biblical covenants in the
flow of redemptive history, not through the theologically deduced
system of CT’s Covenant of Works/Covenant of Grace/Covenant
of Redemption schema.
- The Law of God is both absolute and
covenantal
(Matt. 5:17-20). God’s “absolutelaw”
is innate, written on the heart of man created in the image of God. It
is God’s unchanging standard of righteousness.
God’s “covenantal law,”
however, is written and changeable according to the covenant being
administered.
- The love of God and the love of neighbor are
the two greatest commandments (Matt. 22:36-40) upon which the whole Law
and the Prophets hang. This means that the Ten Commandments, the
Decalogue, hang upon these two greatest commandments, not the reverse
as CT teaches.
- The Ten Commandments are a covenantal
outworking of the two greatest commandments in redemptive history not
the reverse. They were given through the hand of Moses to the nation of
Israel first at Mount Sinai (Exod. 20).
- The Fourth Commandment, the Sabbath
commandment, being the sign of the Mosaic Covenant (Exod. 31:15-17), is
not a creation ordinance as taught by CT.
- The Ten Commandments are not eternal
moral law first written in the heart of man at creation and
forever binding upon all mankind as CT teaches in its confessions of
faith e.g., the Westminster Confession of Faith (1647-1649) and the
Second London Baptist Confession (1689). In fact, the term “moral
law” does not occur in the Bible. Although under
any given covenantal administration, man is morally obligated to obey
all of God’s commandments, yet the Bible does not separate
God’s law into three parts: moral, ceremonial and
civil. Historically, this threefold separation was not
substantially taught until the time of Thomas Aquinas in the 13 th
century and in the 16 th century by Calvin.
- The Decalogue is not “transcovenantal”
and, therefore, does not function outside the Old Covenant as a unit as
much of CT teaches.
- Christ came not to destroy the OT Scriptures
but to fulfill them, which includes the Decalogue. The New Covenant law
is called the law of Christ which is distinguished from Mosaic law and
from the Gentiles who do not have a written revelation of
God’s law (I Cor. 9:20-21).
- The law of Christ is not to be equated with
the
Decalogue. Although the law of Christ, the law of the NC people of God,
is related to the Decalogue in that it incorporates nine of the Ten
Commandments. The law of Christ is a better law
than the law of Moses (Matt. 5:21-48; Heb. 7:19) in the sense that (1)
it is a higher revelation of the righteousness of
God (Matt: 5:20); (2) it is based upon a higher
standard of love (Matt. 5:44); and, (3) Christ’s inauguration
of the New Covenant brings in things that are qualitatively “newer,”
expressed in developing the theological significance of such basic
concepts as new wineskins, new teaching, new commandment,
new creation, new man, new name, new song, new Jerusalem and all things
new (Rev. 21:5).
- The OC Sabbath commandment is typologically
fulfilled by Christ for the people of God who rest in Him by faith
(Heb. 4:9-10).
- New Covenant believers are in-lawed
to Christ; they are not under the OC law of Moses but under the grace
of the NC (Rom. 6:14). NCT does not equate the law of Christ with the
Decalogue as do many holding to CT.
- The indwelling Holy Spirit is the norm for
Christian living. NCT does not teach that the Ten Commandments are the
only objective standard for evaluating the Christian life. Rather, NCT
emphasizes that it is the Spirit who enables the Christian to have a
godly walk (Rom. 8:4; Gal. 5:16-18).
- Christ merited righteousness for the elect
only
and that it is imputed to them based upon His total obedience to the
will of the Father in His life and death (Matt. 3:15; Rom. 5:19).
- The Church, which is the body of Christ (Eph.
1:22-23; Col. 1:18), was first formed in history when the Spirit was
poured out at Pentecost not in past history under the OC. Most holding
to CT see the Church existing in the OT before Pentecost. NCT does not.
Contrary to DT, NCT sees only one redemptive purpose for the people of
God, which is the Church, the good olive tree (Rom. 11), the body of
Christ (Eph. 2:13-22; 3:1-12).
- The ordinance of water baptism is the pledge
of membership in the New Covenant for believers alone and the sign
of the New Covenant is not baptism, rather
the sign is the cup, which
memorializes the New Covenant in Christ’s blood (Luke 22:20;
I Cor. 11:25).
- The “now-not yet”
principle of interpretation is essential to understand the teaching of
the NT. The Christian experiences the commencement of “every
spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in
Christ” (Eph. 1:3), yet he stills awaits the consummation of
these blessings at Christ’s return. The End has come! The End
has not come! The whole theology of the NT is qualified by this
tension: between the “already”
or “now” and the “not
yet” (I John 3:2).
- The “recapitulation”
principle is essential to understand the NT prophetic Scriptures (Matt.
24:4-14 and 24:15-31; Rev. 11:15—12).
- The “blessed hope”
will occur when Christ returns (Titus 2:13) to earth bodily and visibly
(Acts 1:11) at the Second Advent to resurrect, judge and consign the
saved to heaven and the lost to a Christless eternity (John 5:28-29).
__________
Gary D. Long is
the Faculty President of
Providence Theological Institute located in Belton, Texas. Providence
Theological Institute’s website is www.ptitx.org.
|